1. Home
  2. Cruise Lines
  3. Cunard Line
  4. Queen Victoria Review
  5. Queen Victoria Cruise Reviews
4 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: May 2019
A lot of positive reviews have been written about the Queen Victoria and to be fair I agree with a lot of what has already been said especially about the public areas, facilities and the staff, all very good. However, the age demographic ... Read More
A lot of positive reviews have been written about the Queen Victoria and to be fair I agree with a lot of what has already been said especially about the public areas, facilities and the staff, all very good. However, the age demographic on board our cruise I would put as an average of 70 maybe even 75 with many obviously much older, ok that's not a problem if you fall into that age range, I'm in my late fifties and I looked like a spring chicken, honest. Consequently the public rooms were full of old people doing old people things-sleeping, reading books and playing cards. The evening venues were relatively quiet because there weren't a lot of people who wanted to party (apart from the Queens room). If you identify with people who walk around the ship carrying their latest novel (even when going to the theatre) then your quids in. We saw about two families on board I guess they had all the childrens facilities to themselves which must have been good for them. The princess grill was good, the service was excellent the food generally good but not earth shattering and at times below the standard expected. We got a 6 wine package from the Captains table list, the wines were absolutely nothing special, it was quiet amusing to listen to the sommelier wax on about a $11.75 bottle of wine and then charge $57.00 for it (I have the photos but couldn't upload them due to their small size the wine was a J.LOHR Merlot 2016 Los Osos, look it up.). So having paid upwards of £11000 for the cruise and an onboard account of £800 was I happy with the outcome? Generally yes, would we do it again? No. Finally cruising isn't for everyone we had a good time but it didn't quite live up to expectations. Read Less
1 Helpful Vote
Sail Date: March 2019
This was our first sailing on the Victoria and it really is a most impressive ship . We had booked Balcony Club as we prefer the availability of dining when we choose . Shortly before leaving we upgraded to Princess Grill and considered ... Read More
This was our first sailing on the Victoria and it really is a most impressive ship . We had booked Balcony Club as we prefer the availability of dining when we choose . Shortly before leaving we upgraded to Princess Grill and considered the larger suite and good sized balcony well worth the extra cost . We were not , however, impressed by the Princess Grill dining room . It is large and caters for well over 100 people and is thus not an intimate venue . It compares unfavourably with the Club Balcony on the Elizabeth which ( on our earlier cruise) only catered for about 50 people . The waiters ( dedicated to a group of tables ) were polite and charming and very willing to please but on occasion did not notice when the plate was not as ordered. I could not fault the menus – 5 courses for Dinner and Lunch . We don’t have hearty appetites and never ate lunch there preferring to use the casual Lido restaurant where there was always a large range of different types of food where we could “graze” from the self service buffet . Even though we had the onboard spending allowance ( much of which was taken up by the automatic daily charging of staff gratuity charges of $27 ) I found the wine pricing exorbitant. In the restaurant a bottle of Cloudy Bay, Sauvignon Blanc had a basic price of $40 which was not too bad seeing that , tax free , in the UK it would be about £20 (c $26 ) . However a corkage charge of $25 was then added and ,on top of that , there was a service charge of 15% bringing the total up to $ 74.75 . I refrained from any further purchases there . Quite a number of people to whom we spoke also complained about drink pricing policy on the ship . The air conditioning throughout the ship was set low This was affecting the ladies, especially as they had to dress accordingly . A number complained that they had been unable to wear dresses which had been brought especially for gala nights . Perhaps this was a factor in the ship seeming deserted after 10pm . People were more comfortable in their suites. As regards the excursions we found these to be very well organised by Cunard staff as far as getting us off the ship was concerned but they varied in quality from place to place just as was mentioned in Cunard’s publications . They are dependent on local companies whose employees seem often to be students doing casual work . For example , in Mauritius , we had an early start one day and visited a charming old French colonial villa where we were given a bottle of water and offered a couple of very small deep fried battered vegetables . We then drove a long distance to an old sugar plantation factory which had been converted into a museum dedicated to the local spice industry. Here we were led around every section which , because of the time involved in slowly following other groups of visitors, we found intensely boring . It was over by around 2pm and there had been no allowance for lunch and we still had another town to visit . What was annoying was to find that the factory had a very pleasant outdoor café facility of which we were totally unaware and unable to use as we were then driven off for another 2 hours unfed, and with no opportunity of buying a snack anywhere , until we returned to the ship. Our cruise was part of the Victoria’s World Cruise and covered Singapore to CapeTown . When we boarded it was clear from the amount of coughing noted that there was a “bug” in situ . This was clearly recognised by the Medical Centre which had a prominent notice saying that they did not prescribe antibiotics for this bug which they said was a Cold/Flu infection . They admitted it was virulent and could take up to a month to clear completely . My wife caught this after a week aboard and was prescribed only basic cough medication and paracetamol. She saw the doctors twice and , it not improving , was then told that that was the only medication that they could/would prescribe . Her condition worsened and , when we disembarked in CapeTown , she immediately saw a doctor who diagnosed acute bronchitis and prescribed strong antibiotics and steroids and certified her unfit to fly ( we were due to leave 3 days later and this had to be extended by a further 3 days ) . We thus incurred considerable extra cost and had no opportunity of making the most of our time there . Regarding the entertainment (in the magnificent theatre) there were very good lectures during the day e.g. antiques , topical history and politics and regional cuisine but we found the evening shows and performances mediocre . All in all this was a rather like the proverbial curate’s egg – good in parts . For us however it was a disappointing cruise . Read Less
14 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: March 2019
If you want a cruise with everything "English", pick this ship - lots of formal nights (suits and tie and lots of guys in penguin suits), indifferent staff (with a few very pleasant exceptions) many of whom would walk past and ... Read More
If you want a cruise with everything "English", pick this ship - lots of formal nights (suits and tie and lots of guys in penguin suits), indifferent staff (with a few very pleasant exceptions) many of whom would walk past and not even make eye contact (in complete contrast to the staff on our last cruise with Holland America who went out of their way to be friendly and pleasant), average food (some good - but outdoor grill food was terrible), and activities frequently disorganised and inefficient (e.g. up to 3.5 hours to get a tender to shore). Evening entertainment shows were excellent, cabin rooms very good but basic and overpriced, and poor value compared to other lines. Tours were reasonable to expensive but really good guides, but at one port ship arranged for all tour buses to get back to port at same time leaving 2000 passengers standing in the sun for up to an hour while 4 tenders struggled to get us back on the boat. We have done several cruises (P & O, Princess, Carnival, Holland America, Avalon) and rate this ship the lowest. Next time, back to Holland America (for sea journey) or Avalon (for river cruise) - both were 5 star. For veranda suite only one restaurant and buffet to chose from, two other restaurants had ridiculous cover charge with limited menu. Read Less
2 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: March 2019
We chose this cruise to visit Vietnam and Hong Kong and finish with a stint in Singapore. this segment was 22 days. - we were medically disembarked on day 18. Please read on to the Cunard Cough Embarkation was so smooth and took just ... Read More
We chose this cruise to visit Vietnam and Hong Kong and finish with a stint in Singapore. this segment was 22 days. - we were medically disembarked on day 18. Please read on to the Cunard Cough Embarkation was so smooth and took just minutes. The Cabin 8114 was clean, comfortable and the steward wonderful. Dining in the Lido Buffet offered a wide variety of choices of excellent food. Unfortunately the furniture in the Lido needs a very good clean and the chairs were very grubby and the salt and pepper shakers were the main source of germs. The main restaurant was very disappointing. The offerings were average at best and the service was not up to the food and service standard that we experienced on the Queen Elizabeth a few years ago. Mock cream was offered with desserts. MOCK Cream!!!!! when you can get fresh whipped in the Lido buffet - that was not logical, fine dining Vs buffet and we got mock cream. Might sound picky, but the rest of the food followed suit. The entertainment nightly and offerings during the day were very good. Excursions were well managed, Tender ports took forever to get off, so get down early if you are doing a self-tour as these leave after the excursions. MEDICAL CENTRE - excellent service for all those who became sick, and those with the dreaded CUNARD COUGH. Yes, it has a name, This cough is a virus and was rampant on our cruise. It put too many passengers in sick bay and resulted with us getting pneumonia and having to leave the cruise early to get specialised hospitalisation and treatment. Many passengers didn't like getting treatment on the ship as their travel insurance was not top notch and they didn't want to pay, therefore they coughed and coughed and gave it to many others. The doctors and medical staff we give 1000%, we would not be here writing this without them. Yes our travel insurance paid up but we were very honest with them and took out extra and got their approval to cover pre-existing conditions. Would we go again - no, we felt the overall standard on this cruise was not what we enjoyed a few years ago, and on review we will not take the health risks. Read Less
1 Helpful Vote
Sail Date: February 2019
× I awarded my cruise of 2017 5 stars no problem × I struggled to award 3 stars on this cruise, just 2 years later. WHY Pre embarkation × met at Brisbane airport by a Princess Cruises representative! × taken, without P C ... Read More
× I awarded my cruise of 2017 5 stars no problem × I struggled to award 3 stars on this cruise, just 2 years later. WHY Pre embarkation × met at Brisbane airport by a Princess Cruises representative! × taken, without P C rep, to a local hotel who had no knowledge of us and were not expecting us × later driven to Cruise Terminal by an aggressive, unhelpful taxi driver. He even refused to lift our luggage into the boot Post embarkation and cabin × cabin as expected with helpful staff Dining x poor. Food never hot enough. Vegetables undercooked. Fancy menu not relecting what arrived on my plate x Lidl...sorry Lido, an horrendous dining experience. Gueste seen eating food from their plates on the way to their tables. Decor, plastic, pastel, ( un ) pleasant Entertainment etc x poor, particularly the ballroom catering for the minority not the majority x Service...excellent from x purser's desk x housekeeping x all maintenance crew Ports and Shore excursions x never leave anything to chance...book a private tour or research own Read Less
4 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: February 2019
The cabin D7017 is small and poorly appointed with a small dressing table, minimum storage facilities, particularly if a long voyage. The bathroom small but manageable however the shower cubicle is pokey! Television channels are ... Read More
The cabin D7017 is small and poorly appointed with a small dressing table, minimum storage facilities, particularly if a long voyage. The bathroom small but manageable however the shower cubicle is pokey! Television channels are extremely limited and there is no interactive channel. Frankly it looked rather 'tired'. Room service is available but our experience has been that nothing arrived 'hot'. Lukewarm seems to have been the best that could be managed. Public areas of Queen Victoria are comfortable and the waiter service excellent. Dining is tedious with a two seating arrangement at 18.00hrs and 20.00hrs. 18.00 rather too early especially if returning from shore excursions. The shopping on board was as appears to be the case with most cruise ships directed toward high end buying with selections of 'watches and jewellery' endlessly tedious. Bar prices are definitely high. Personally I wouldn't choose a Cunard ship again...there's far better value for my hard earned cash out there. Read Less
7 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: February 2019
We were on the 21-day crossing of the Pacific from San Francisco to Sydney. We have been on 32 cruises on various lines and have sailed with Cunard many times before. We chose this crossing as a way to get us to our 2-month adventure in ... Read More
We were on the 21-day crossing of the Pacific from San Francisco to Sydney. We have been on 32 cruises on various lines and have sailed with Cunard many times before. We chose this crossing as a way to get us to our 2-month adventure in Australia. We were very happy with the transportation, but not too thrilled with the Queen Victoria nor the cruise ship features of this crossing. While we found the Victoria to have a lovely interior design, we couldn't help but compare her to the Queen Mary 2, which we prefer for her spaciousness and a couple of grand public rooms, like the Chart Room. The Victoria was very crowded with long waits for elevators and to disembark at ports. The activities and entertainment were aimed directly at most of the passengers who were very old retirees. There were almost no young people on board which is probably a good thing since they might have been quite bored. The most popular activities were ballroom dancing, dance lessons, and chair aerobics. Everyone was in bed by 11:00. Cunard, and especially the Queen Victoria, have defined their niche as nostalgia for the features of ocean-liner travel from decades ago. Thus lots of formal nights with a dress code strictly enforced, and very subdued entertainment. The food? Well it was cruise ship food with lots of dishes, like steak Diane, which pretty much don't exist on land anymore. We dined in the Princess Grill, which was OK, but I have a very hard time remembering any dinners in particular. Just dull. We tried the Lido buffet a few times but found the food like a school cafeteria. No complaints about the service. We were happy to reach Australia safely and without jet lag. But we were also happy to leave the ship and move on to our next adventure. We will return to Cunard and the Queen Mary in September for an Atlantic crossing, which will be fine since it's not a cruise, but I doubt if we will return to the Queen Victoria and the cruise ship style of Cunard. Finally I want to state that we did not get value for money. This cruise was very expensive, maybe because it was a segment of the popular World Cruise. We have traveled on a couple of luxury lines at much lower per person per day rates and received much more in various features. Still it was probably cheaper than flying first class to Australia. Read Less
12 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: December 2018
This was our second in Queen Victoria. But the first since the 2017 alterations. Our reason was partly because the first was so good - not always the wisest reason - and the second because we wanted to get away. Embarkation at Mayflower ... Read More
This was our second in Queen Victoria. But the first since the 2017 alterations. Our reason was partly because the first was so good - not always the wisest reason - and the second because we wanted to get away. Embarkation at Mayflower Terminal, Southampton was flawless. No filling of health forms, no waiting on not so comfortable seats, straight to a check-in desk and on to the ship. I do not know why it was so quick, perhaps because we were latish for boarding. Be that as it may, by far the most efficient and fast. Our cabin on deck 4, with balcony was quite adequate, albeit the shower/toilet cubicle could hardly have been much smaller - significantly less than on our Brittany Ferry just a few hours before. But adequate overall, comfortable bed and well looked after by our steward whom, apart from initial contact, we never saw again. Deck 4 is I think at the lower end of cost structure, but the balconies are larger. Also closer to the theater and Britannia Restaurant levels. But a longish trek for the Lido self service, unless you take the lift. Eating at this catagory of cabin is at the Britannia Restaurant, either first or second sitting, for dining, which for us is either too early or too late, but that is the system. There is no freedom dining on Cunard unless you chose a specialty restaurant or a much more expensive catagory of cabin. There are now on Queen Victoria some very,very luxurious staterooms with restaurants to match, but we were never privileged to experience them. But the entertainment, such as it is, is common to all. Food, then, in the Britannia Restaurant is, for dinner, three courses. Quantity for us was ideal, but for some the portions are small. Quality and variety was on the whole good. Sometimes, very good. Waiter service was attentive skilful and courteous. On occasion however, our team was overpressed by having to deal with the cabin's table immediately alongside us. But overall, dinner was a pleasant experience, and for those careful of their weight, no great risk to it. As to drinks, we did not take any, simply because we live in France and the cost differential was just too great. The sommelier took this in good heart. Fort us, the disillusionment stemmed from the entertainment. This was a ten night cruise, with five sea days, and four ports of call. That results in a lot of time on board the ship. Filling that constructively and interestingly we found difficult. There were four guest speakers. Each was an expert in his given field - not always the case. Each we found interesting but others we spoke to did not. That is the risk. But in each case the lectures - Cunard call them Insight Lectures - were during the morning, often one after the other with just time to change the programme on the computer display machine. After that, for the rest of the day, there was a void until dinner time. So, on a cruise with several sea days, be careful to decide what you are going to do. With inclement weather at this time of year to be expected, you may have to amuse yourself. Reading a book brought from home may not be a memorable way of passing expensive days onboard. On the other hand, this ship has an impressive and extensive library. Evening entertainent: five singing and dancing shows, active but not elegant, with singing at the top of the voice And not the greatest at that. Apart from this, which is fine if you like it, there was one male entertainer, one female pianist who played with over panache apart from Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue which she clearly loved, one ancient TV show star, and two French acrobats of outstanding ability. Apart from this there was a number of specific interest groups such as story writing, knitting, ipad instruction ( at a cost), gin tasting ( at more cost), and speciality groups which we did not recognise So a comfortable and quite elegant ship with, for us, not enough to do in it Excursion bookable through Cunard were predictable if you have been this way before, which many passengers had. One, the moonscape walk on Lanzarote was outstanding. One in GranCanaria was pleasant. One in Vigo which we wanted to go and booked, was cancelled through lack of take-up. Something which in our experience, happens quite often. Homework before you go may well lead you to local tours at far less cost. As well as cost, if booked, the excursion will go ahead, unless Cunard cancels it. Just as well, in the event, since Vigo was blessed with poor weather. If all else fails, take the Vigo ferry across the estuary. It runs every twenty minutes, costs 2 euros and is fun. If you like that sort of thing. At least close to the water and sometimes pretty rough. Disembarkation is by stateroom catagory, the most expensive first. At deck 4, we were the second to last catagory, but the buffet was open throughout, the table tennis freely available, and offloading the passengers well ahead of schedule, so quite painless. This is a ship which still looks like a ship, even though for some, the alterations to the tiered deck stern has spoilt its lines. If that is not important to you, that does not matter. Would we go on this ship again? Not unless it was something really special. As was our first trip the Lusitania centenary. Read Less
5 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: October 2018
Loved the ship.The interior was beautiful.The meals in the Brittania restaurant were very good and our waiter was cheerful and helpful. Not too impressed with the entertainment.although the Harpist and string trio were very good. ... Read More
Loved the ship.The interior was beautiful.The meals in the Brittania restaurant were very good and our waiter was cheerful and helpful. Not too impressed with the entertainment.although the Harpist and string trio were very good. Embarkation was a fiasco and disembarkation wasn't much better .StateRoom and table for dining not assigned when we boarded the ship. Don't bother with the Verandah as I thought the meal wasn't worth the extra although the service was good On the whole though the food in all the other restaurants was very good. The two gala nights weren't what I would have called special.The Roaring Twenties night was neither roaring or Twenties, dancing was done to contemporary music,a big let down for me and my partner. The ports of call were lovely apart from Corfu and the excursions were overpriced for what they were.i shan't talk about the exhorbitant drink prices and the added 15% "for your convenience" charge. On the whole it was an enjoyable cruise but not quite the experience that I was hoping for. Read Less
3 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: September 2018
My wife and I choose this cruise to celebrate our 27th anniversary just the 2 of us, and to visit Venice the first time; this ship docked overnight in Venice which is perfect to see this amazing city. We searched many cruise ships, and ... Read More
My wife and I choose this cruise to celebrate our 27th anniversary just the 2 of us, and to visit Venice the first time; this ship docked overnight in Venice which is perfect to see this amazing city. We searched many cruise ships, and choose this one due to the brand name "Cunard" for luxury cruises. We found out to be over exaggerated. First the cabin is not comfortable due to the air conditioner in the stateroom is not able to turn off; you can set the temperature from cold to hot, but it won't turn the air off !!! We can't sleep with air running in high speed all the time, and made us sneezing most of the time; it's terrible. Checked with the room stewardess and he confirmed that it is centralized control. Secondly, the food is not that fantastic compared to our previous experiences with Holland America and Princess cruises. We, from time to time, ran into dirty glasses and plates. Also we felt sometimes 2nd class passengers because we could not attend the Queen Grill restaurant. 3rd the entertainments are not that great. They repeated the show; we have experienced during this 21 days cruise. And 4th we felt uncomfortable with the service and tender staff, because they spoke in their own Filipino language, and wished that they used English as their official communication. Read Less
5 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: August 2018
Firstly the good points: Super speedy embarkation , fantastic food on board, two spectacular stops in Flaam & Gerainger. Bergen was Ok but Haugesaund was dreary. We travelled for the first time with Cunard last Fall to the Canaries ... Read More
Firstly the good points: Super speedy embarkation , fantastic food on board, two spectacular stops in Flaam & Gerainger. Bergen was Ok but Haugesaund was dreary. We travelled for the first time with Cunard last Fall to the Canaries and it was wonderful, 10/10. (Queen Elizabeth). This time there didn’t seem to be the same number of staff around. Longer waits to be served with drinks seemed the norm. The food as before was excellent both in the Brittania and the Lido Buffett. The Oriental night and the Indian night in the Lido were exceptional. Drinks are in my opinion pretty reasonable on both the Q.V. & QE , around the same price as you would expect to pay in a London hotel. (And of course you get on board spend which dilutes the cost) To be honest we will look to travel on the QE again next time as this cruise was a slight let down. Read Less
5 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: August 2018
We booked on-board QM2 on our T/A last year. The QM2 cruise was because is was an experience we wanted to have at least once. This cruise was booked as we wanted to try a smaller Cunard ship and see the fjords. Our overall ... Read More
We booked on-board QM2 on our T/A last year. The QM2 cruise was because is was an experience we wanted to have at least once. This cruise was booked as we wanted to try a smaller Cunard ship and see the fjords. Our overall impression of Cunard is a rather dark and subdued ship with a quiet atmosphere. This sophisticated atmosphere was pretty good for me but a little too staid for my wife, who's favorite line is Celebrity with Regent Seven Seas coming in second. The balcony cabin was fine, though it appeared cabin upgrades were not part of last year's refitting. We generally cruise in a suite and have never used Celebrity's MDR, so cannot make a comparison. We found the food in the Britannia restaurant to be just decent. A number of dishes were not prepared properly. The buffet happened to be quite good and the setup and service on QV was far superior to QM2. Our biggest problem was the travel desk. My wife has difficulty walking and we were concerned about her walking from the ship to the railroad in Flam. We spoke to staff shortly after boarding and on the day of the tour. They seemed totally disinterested in the problem. When we (barely) got to the train, the tour guides and train crew were very helpful to her. Read Less
3 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: July 2018
This was our first cruise and had been looking forward to it for such a long time. Overall we enjoyed it and ensured we had a good time. However, our experience was marred by poor service on a number of occasions along with ... Read More
This was our first cruise and had been looking forward to it for such a long time. Overall we enjoyed it and ensured we had a good time. However, our experience was marred by poor service on a number of occasions along with indiscretions from two employees who were managers. Whilst the good old British class system is still alive and kicking, you don't expect it from the crew !!! The ship is beautiful and was a pleasure to be on. The food we found to be very good and we thought that Britannia Club dining was ideal for us. The drinks are very expensive in general, but the wines are extortionate. So how come P&O are more reasonable ? Our balcony room on deck 8 was bigger than we had expected and was very comfortable. However, the bathroom is small with a shower that was absolutely tiny. The water being either very hot or scalding no matter where the temperature control was set. Deck 8 is not ideal if you want a lie-in as the scraping of deck chairs from 06:30 becomes your early morning wake-up call. We also had to make do with the mini-bar contents being left on top of the cupboard, the entire two weeks as our cabin person didn't seem to want to move them anywhere else after "emptying" our fridge. Embarkation was efficient, although disembarkation was a complete shambles. Time in ports were limited. I suspect that they are just long enough for the official excursions from the cruise line. Could have done with longer to enjoy the local atmosphere better. Overall, like I said we did enjoy our holiday but it could have been so much better. It was the little things that let it down, mainly service and maintenance - shame. Read Less
3 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: July 2018
As a solo traveler I had hoped that this cruise would be enjoyable, it wasn’t. A lot of the time I felt that the ship was too crowded and it could be difficult to enjoy everything it had to offer. For instance, the sun loungers. Plenty ... Read More
As a solo traveler I had hoped that this cruise would be enjoyable, it wasn’t. A lot of the time I felt that the ship was too crowded and it could be difficult to enjoy everything it had to offer. For instance, the sun loungers. Plenty of them, but most draped with towels even though no one was using them. Obviously people would bag their lounger and keep it all day. The lido restaurant, often I had to eat later than I wanted to as there were no free tables. The staff were efficient at clearing the tables but the layout of the food areas was confusing. It would be better if the service area was more thoughtfully laid out. Lots of people seemed to be walking around looking for things. The cost of drinks on board was very high, not unlike London hotel prices. Fair enough, however, I was charged an exorbitant £25 for a large glass of Cloudy Bay wine in the restaurant! Plus all drinks carry an extra 15% service charge, and then they leave space for another gratuity. All this when you are also paying a “one off” service charge of $161 per person for the fortnight. Read Less
6 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: April 2018
Boring food in the Britannia restaurant. Food in buffet was good and always easy to find somewhere to sit. Evening entertainment poor. We were never asked if we wanted a drink when we were in a bar or at the pool. the waiters were ... Read More
Boring food in the Britannia restaurant. Food in buffet was good and always easy to find somewhere to sit. Evening entertainment poor. We were never asked if we wanted a drink when we were in a bar or at the pool. the waiters were impossible to find. Port excursions were well run. Assisted embarkation and disembarkation were excellent. Bridge players considered the games room belonged only to them. We only saw cabin steward on embarkation day. Had the toilet mended four times, engineer came very promptly. Breakfast in cabin always correct and arrived within timescale. Didn’t have afternoon tea in Queens Room due to long queues and it was very noisy. We expected this to be an elegant occasion. In the evenings attire was much less formal than on p and o. This was particularly noticeable on formal night. Ship was peaceful and we liked the plush carpets but would have liked pictures in the corridors. Read Less
3 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: February 2018
The cruise visited places that were not easily accessed by road. The ports and opportunity to visit Macchu Piccu was amazing. The Panama Canal transit was fascinating. However, we felt the Queen Vic could do better. Why with all the ... Read More
The cruise visited places that were not easily accessed by road. The ports and opportunity to visit Macchu Piccu was amazing. The Panama Canal transit was fascinating. However, we felt the Queen Vic could do better. Why with all the focus on ocean environmental responsibility does the ship use plastic cotton buds( refer David Attenborough,) plastic straws, plastic spoons, endless small plastic toiletrie bottles. The whole company could be an environmental leader -very disappointing. When is this stopping.? The cabin steward was pleasant but not very efficient-coffee/tea supplies not identified and replenished. Glasses and cups not always cleaned. Some items found in cupboards from previous occupants. Food was disappointingly bland compared with Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth in past five years.. The Staff at Britannia restaurant at breakfast could be offhand, arrogant,and overly officious. Generally the staff were excellent and coped well with the extra work involved with the outbreak of gastro -enteritis. Read Less
17 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2018
We recently sailed South America 50 days roundtrip from/to Fort Lauderdale on Queen Victoria. Main reason for selecting this cruise was the destination ports of - Barbados, Rio, B Aires, Montevideo, Santiago, Lima, Montechristo, Equador ... Read More
We recently sailed South America 50 days roundtrip from/to Fort Lauderdale on Queen Victoria. Main reason for selecting this cruise was the destination ports of - Barbados, Rio, B Aires, Montevideo, Santiago, Lima, Montechristo, Equador home of Panama Hats and passage through the Panama Canal - Belize was also a pleasant surprise. The service we received from our cabin steward and restaurant and bar staff were excellent - these were by far the most helpful and best people onboard. The ships decor was very good, although a little dark in the main areas and too bare in the deck corridors (a few pictures would help). However, i would never cruise on this ship again and possibly never again with Cunard. Embarkation was a 5 hour nightmare, leaving Miami hotel at 10.00 am on a 45 min journey to FLL to then be left sitting in a waiting room with hundreds of passengers for 3.5 hours without water or any real explanation for delay. - Cunard are not good at organisation or communication - they appear oblivious to the frustrations of their customers, many of whom were as equally upset. Unfotunately this problem continued throughout the trip - we booked many shore excursions and were herded along lengthy queues into either the ballroom or theatre to sit for minimum 45 mins whilst the ship berthed or cleared immigration etc with little recognition from the shorex staff as to the poor quality of communication and organisation - only a condescending thank you for your patience over the speakers. Our final disembarkation was the worst experience and poorest organisation I have ever encountered. We were asked to vacate cabin by 8.00am latest and removed from ship by 8.15am to queue for almost 2 hours as we cleared US immigration (could have been done onboard as with other ports) - then transferred to a nearby hotel curbside and placed in a ballroom with hundreds of other passengers to await instructions about transfer to airport. There was no Cunard representative to be found, only an outsourced contractor service agent. Shuttles were arranged throughout the day - ours being the final transfer at almost 5.30pm to travel through Miami rush hour for nearly 2 hours - why we were not taken to Miami in the morning begs belief. Our driver dumped us outside departures some 25 to 30 mins haul with multiple suitcases to our check in desk. Ship to check in desk took almost 12 hours - if that is Cunards idea of hospitality and Customer service, then we, as will many others we spoke to, will not be enduring with Cunard again. The ship suffered many problems during this Exotic World Cruise - power failures, near disaster rounding Cape Horn as crew were stranded trying to take photos from a jet boat that took over 5 hours to rescue due to extremely hazardous waters and weather conditions, multiple outbreaks of throat infections, flu and gastro illness plus noro virus isolations and 5 days emegency hygienne controls due to a reported 4% incident level. If you like ballroom dancing, playing cards and dont mind paying extortionate wine prices, being entertained by acts from Britains got Talent style shows and like to be in bed between 8.30 and 9.30pm - Queen Vic may be for you, but not us. WiFi is more dial up than broadband. Read Less
7 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2018
Our most recent cruise was with Cunnard on the Queen Victoria for fifty days circling South America. We chose this cruise for it's exciting itinerary. We had not previously cruised with Cunnard but were looking forw ard to it's ... Read More
Our most recent cruise was with Cunnard on the Queen Victoria for fifty days circling South America. We chose this cruise for it's exciting itinerary. We had not previously cruised with Cunnard but were looking forw ard to it's legendary excellence. The ship was beautifully appointed and well maintained. The staff and service at dinner, in the lounges, and shops was excellent. The cabin steward was outstanding. However, there were disappointments. After a tiring and curt embarkation in Ft. Lauderdale, my luggage was missing for six hours after we were at sea. It was found with tags attached. When we disembarked fifty days later, one fully tagged bag was missing. It was found in the area of unlabeled luggage, tags intact. The food was sometimes good but on the whole was mediocre.. It was not of the expected Cunnard experience. The wine list was good but outrageously overpriced. In contrast, the wine served at the Commodore's receptions was of the cheapest quality; certainly not on the list. The evening show entertainment was amateurish. There was a lack of entertainment planning. When one venue was offered, there was no alternative. There was virtually no simultaneous entertainment across the ship. The tour office had organisational difficulty in the manner of disembarkation to the tour . busses. They diden't seem to be on top of tours arranged. We had engaged a private car in Buenos Aires for a full day but the vendor insisted it was a half day. Queen Victoria"s mistake was our loss. The ship had a power failure and multiple elevator repairs. The ship was refurbished last year but I wonder if enough attention was given to it's ventilation system. There were initial health issues with flu and upper and lower respiratory disease. This was followed at the end of the cruise by a norovirus spread that led to gastric problems. The level of disease mandated emergency hygienic food control measures just five days before disembarkation in Ft Lauderdale where CDC personnel boarded. Most of the passengers were elderly. There were canes, walkers, wheel chairs and scooters. Many came to dance to recorded or live music in the beautiful ball room. Some never left ship. We are classed as elderly but prefer a more fun and organized cruise. lWe will nevr board the Queen Vicoria again and probably not Cunnard either. Read Less
8 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: December 2017
As to be expected the itinerary was changed due to the weather although we did make 3 ports as planned but Rotterdam instead of Amsterdam Zeebrugge on a different day and Cherbourg. I had decided to go into a Q5 and there is no ... Read More
As to be expected the itinerary was changed due to the weather although we did make 3 ports as planned but Rotterdam instead of Amsterdam Zeebrugge on a different day and Cherbourg. I had decided to go into a Q5 and there is no mistaking the cabin is a move up from the standard cabin. The fact the bathroom has his and her sinks a shower and a bath tells you all. 4189 is an aft corner balcony so in warmer climes you could fit 30 people on it if so inclined! You get a butler and complimentary drinks, but only for use within the cabin. Otherwise this is still a pay as you go ship. The Queens Grill was a bit of a disappointment. The menu and choice is amazing but recent changes means it's not what is once was. The A La Carte menu has shrunk and the number of items that need to be ordered by lunchtime has grown. However my big gripe is how they operate the Grill. As in Britania you have an allocated table, it works for dinner but otherwise you end up, as in my case, as a one on a table for 9! Breakfast and lunch with no thought about maybe offering open sitting so not leaving solo guests, or indeed a couple stranded on a table. The other challenge is guests arriving as they wish. On more than one occasion the cast of Ben Hur poured in at 8pm the table ordered by 8.10 and food arrived 40 mins later. I raised it with the maitre d and he apologised and had my food expedited, which was nice but left the rest of the table waiting. The Grill is supposed to be the pinnicle of culinary experience at sea, it wasn't and for me there was a creeping in of this becoming a bit of a banquet experience. My other complaint is the price of being on board the bar prices and wine list are very expensive and it was obvious that a lot of passengers were voting with their feet and not purchasing. The packages are badly thought out which doesn't help. So would I go back to the Grills, no. For the price you're expected to pay they're not worth it. Yes you get a fab suite with all the trimmings but the Food experience blighted the trip and the Britania, whilst it has its issues, is on balance much better value. My overall 3star may be a tad harsh but based on expectation and £400 a day it's not a 4star experience Read Less
6 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: December 2017
This was our 9th cruise, but the first with Cunard. We had high expectations, having cruised with Princess, P&O and RCI we expected Cunard to perhaps be a cut above. Unfortunately that was not the case, let down by poor customer ... Read More
This was our 9th cruise, but the first with Cunard. We had high expectations, having cruised with Princess, P&O and RCI we expected Cunard to perhaps be a cut above. Unfortunately that was not the case, let down by poor customer service. We drove ourselves to Southampton and handed over 2 perfectly good working order suitcases, by the time we got to our cabin after over an hour and a half wait, despite having turned up at the allotted time, one of our hard shell cases had been cracked and the handle rammed so far in it would not come out again. We took the case to reception and they said they would have the technicians look at it and if it couldn't be fixed we would be "compensated". To cut a long story short, the case came back after 2 days with the crack repaired but the handle still immovable - so back it went to the technicians. The last night we got it back again, still not fixed but with an insurance claim form!! By this time my husband not best pleased went marching back to reception to argue the point that we had been promised compensation at the outset and to claim on the insurance would be a major hassle, not to mention the fact by the time they would have taken the excess the money would effectively have been written off. Finally the girl on reception spoke to head customer services lady and they agreed they would pay the compensation as onboard credit. Why they could not have done this in the first place and saved us a whole of grief I do not know, but it seriously coloured our opinion of Cunard to the point where i would not be in a hurry to cruise with them again. The other thing we had an issue with was the cabin service. We were missing a bathrobe/slippers when we got to the cabin, not a major problem but they should have been there...... also when i broke the shower gel bottle, 2nd day, it was not replaced even though it was obvious there was an issue with it as the top had sheared off. Again nothing major but not picked up by the steward. On the plus side, the ship was beautifully decorated for Christmas, the food in the Dining Room was very good, and our waiter Romeo and his assistant were amazing, big shout out to them. We had a deluxe inside cabin and it was plenty big enough, we were on a low deck (for stability) and barely felt the ship move, even though it was rocky in places. We used the gym quite a lot and it was well equipped, plenty of towels, water etc. I bought a day pass for the spa to use the hydrotherapy pool, steam rooms etc, and whilst it was enjoyable, at least 1 of the steam rooms was broken, and not sure about a 2nd one that didn't seem to be working properly, however it is a nice space if you want somewhere quiet to chill out. If it hadn't been for the cabin/customer service issues I would have given a higher rating but i was disappointed that a company i was expecting to be top notch let themselves down on minor issues. Read Less
2 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: November 2017
We chose this cruise to get some winter sun without needing to fly. The ship is fabulous and most of the staff were 2nd to none though we felt there could have been more staff especially in the Britannia restaurant where they were rushed ... Read More
We chose this cruise to get some winter sun without needing to fly. The ship is fabulous and most of the staff were 2nd to none though we felt there could have been more staff especially in the Britannia restaurant where they were rushed off their feet. . Embarkation was very smooth and hassle free. We were in our cabin in no time and our luggage arrived soon after. The cabin was accessible and a generous size with excellent bathroom facilities. The food in the Britannia restaurant was very good though the wines expensive. The lunch menu in the Lido was repetitive. The Cunard entertainment was very dated - magician, ventriloquist, average comedian, acrobats. It's saving grace was the guest entertainment, Georgina Jackson ex-Ronnie Scotts, an outstanding pianist flown in from Vegas, a classical guitarist, and the Rewind project consisting of 10cc lead singer and Moody Blues drummer plus other outstanding session musicians. The Cunard orchestra playing jazz were wasted by only having 1 jazz session in the pub. This venue and the Yacht room were far to small for live music. Not everyone is into sequence dancing in the ballroom as the last night party in the ballroom with the Rewind project showed. You couldn't move! It was fab. Activities were a bit lame - bridge, dance classes, needlework/knitting group, films in the theatre. All films and activities were repeated after 2 weeks and this was a 24 day cruise. For some reason the tour staff weren't able to put on any tours for wheelchair users. We travelled to the Caribbean and couldn't see it to its full extent due to lack of suitable transport. I was told by the desk staff that 'they are small islands and don't have accessible transport' What rubbish! In Martinique a group of wheelchair users had to arrange their own shuttle bus out of the port, at our own expense. After an argument with Cunard tour staff this $30 was refunded. After this episode an accessible shuttle bus was provided in Barbados. Not sure if we would travel with Cunard again as the daily activities and theatre shows were pretty poor however the ship is excellent. We even survived a Force 11 violent storm. The average age of the travellers was about 75. Maybe the fly cruise would be different. Read Less
4 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: November 2017
First time to cruise Cunard.... The ship is nicely decorated and cabin is comfortable. I am very picky with the choice of bed and I had good sleep on board. Starts with The embarkation. It was a mess and badly organised. After ... Read More
First time to cruise Cunard.... The ship is nicely decorated and cabin is comfortable. I am very picky with the choice of bed and I had good sleep on board. Starts with The embarkation. It was a mess and badly organised. After check-in, we were told to wait for them to call our group but there were so many of us never even assign a group. My friend told the staff about the problem. They just ignored and kept told us to wait for the group to call. So we walked in with one of the group by ourself and noone notice since there weren't actually have a system. The service in the ship is excellent. We were sitting in a table for 2 in the Britianian Restaurant. Our waiters are very welcoming and professional. We enjoyed our dinning experience every night. The supervisor of our waiters is also very attentive and friendly. He make sure everything done perfectly. The taste of the food is great. The chef did a good job. However, the choice is limited. Sometimes my friend and I hardly could pick something from the menu. We have taken many cruises before and we both think they could do much better on the menu. Sometimes all the soup offered are spicy. Many people can't take spicy food and I have no soup that night. There are also hardly any beef dishes offered. Only 2 dinner menu offering beef in a 9 days cruise is very rare. Just a little more carefully designed menu will go a long way. Dance classes are excellent. The dance couple are professional and the classes are well organised and full of content. Fencing classes are nice and new to me. I enjoyed it. Queen Victoria offer only 3 dance hosts in this cruise. I heard usually there are 5 or 6. Jenny is great. She is so friendly and I can see her enjoying the night making sure everyone taking care of in the Queens room. She danced with both men and ladies and everyone likes her. The other 2 dance hosts.... I spotted them checking their watch often. Queen Victoria could do better on their shows. Maybe that's why the theatre is quite empty. I also skipped a few of them since they tend to be very similar. Put a bit more budget on the production might help to keep up with the other cruise lines. The ship tend to be very quiet all the time. If you not interested in dancing, there is not too many other activities to choose from. Luckily I do like dancing. The booking system and technology on-board seems to be a bit outdated. We need to line up at the front desk for every single question. The line could be very long. I understand the age of passengers are not on the young side. But don't underestimate their ability to use technology. Simply including the bill checking system in room or just in public area would really help. The Cunard website also need some update. Couldn't get too much done on our own online pages. Overall it is a great cruise and I enjoyed the experenice on the Queen Victoria. Read Less
2 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: October 2017
This was only our second cruise and we picked it because we wanted to experience the "luxury" of Cunard. We were aware that the clientele would be older and were OK with that. Embarkation in Venice was somewhat chaotic and ... Read More
This was only our second cruise and we picked it because we wanted to experience the "luxury" of Cunard. We were aware that the clientele would be older and were OK with that. Embarkation in Venice was somewhat chaotic and very slow, there was not a big crowd, but it took a long time to get through the process, not really great in this automated day and age. First impressions of the ship were favourable, it was nicely appointed, and really quite stylish. It was also easy to navigate around. The room was OK (what I expected). Décor somewhat dated, but acceptable anyway. One word of warning, Cunard's website states that the cabins have UK and Euro plugs, in fact our cabin had 4 US plugs, 2 European plugs and 1 UK plug, so take your converters if you have more that one device to charge! The 1/2 bottle of sparkling wine was a nice touch. Cabin Steward was superb. Food The Lido restaurant (Buffet) is typical buffet fare, not good, not bad just average, BUT the service is poor with tables not being cleared quickly. There are free juices and coffee but it is self serve (which I was OK with). Breakfast was a bit of a scrum, the Britannia restaurant is only open 8 - 9.30, which means almost everyone hits the Lido Buffet and there simply is not enough space. Either make more space of extend the Britannia breakfast hours. Staff in the Lido seemed depressed, not sure I saw a smile all cruise! Britannia - Reasonable food, a fair choice and (in our case at least) very attentive service. Good wine choice, but very expensive. Waiters very good. Golden Lion Pub - limited lunch choice, but quite nice, service a bit hit and miss. Drinks inordinately expensive, $15 for a double G and T is a bit eye watering! Entertainment - Mixed, nothing really in the day time, other than the odd lecture and cards etc. I guess suited the older clientele, but not us, fortunately the weather was OK so we could sit on the deck and read or just catch some sun. To many of the courses are charged for (learn to use an iPad for example), and it just felt like they were nickel and diming (more on that later). Evening shows OK, on board entertainers were a bit "Saturday night live", but reasonable, the visiting acts were quite good with one being excellent. But it always had an "amateur hour" feel to it. And the entertainment director seemed to feel the need to introduce and say goodbye to every act - sometimes less is more! Excursions - Well organised and in most case quite good, but VERY expensive (similar tours could be had immediately you stepped ashore for 1/2 the price), I expect a mark up but this was too much. Disembarkation went well - we elected to "self serve" that is take our own case s off, which was effective. Transfers from the port to Rome were nothing short of profiteering, with a bus ride costing $69 and a private car $325 (it was only a taxi). There were taxis available at the port, and we pre-booked a car (port approved, pick up at the ship) for about $140. Again a mark up is OK, but this was daylight robbery! So overall I enjoyed the cruise, the ship was nice, the food was reasonable, and the itinerary was good. But I would not go on Cunard again, I can only compare it with one other cruise (Royal Caribbean) and that had a much "happier" and more lively feel. The real issue was that Cunard have a reputation for "luxury and Quality", yet my over powering feeling was that I was being nickel and dimed at every step - so slightly disapointing Read Less
4 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: September 2017
We spent 7 days on a cruise on Queen Vic. From Venice to Athens. I knew it was not ther cruise for me when i noticed on the daily activity “Chair aerobics”. Excellent food,excellent staff service and operasrting BUT! Bars mostly empty ... Read More
We spent 7 days on a cruise on Queen Vic. From Venice to Athens. I knew it was not ther cruise for me when i noticed on the daily activity “Chair aerobics”. Excellent food,excellent staff service and operasrting BUT! Bars mostly empty due to high cost of drinks-but the pub was full every days wplaying darts and cards and trivia. Ballroom dancing each night most popular b it you would not want to go and break out on a dance. Most Aussies wondering why the decks were empty at 10pm.oh and for single ladies they did supply officers to dance with you- looked like they had stepped out of a coffin! So if you want a happy cruise of fun this would not be the one to choose, It seems they are relying on all the Brits who want to practice their ballroom dancing and stay in the pub and play darts.And there are plenty of these so no need to change. Basically a shame as had great expectations for a masquerade ball and 20”s evening- a flop unless you had a partner and did proper ballroom dancing moves. Lack of atmosphere and only highlights were good food and good ports.Oh and 1 good comedy show otherwise just ships entertainment. Shops well stocked with quality. Tried fencing but only 12 people allowed for. Read Less
2 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: September 2017
This was the 14 night cruise, Venice to Rome. This was our third cruise on this ship and fourth with Cunard so we know the standards that CAN be achieved. (Most recent previous experience was in March this year - Auckland NZ to ... Read More
This was the 14 night cruise, Venice to Rome. This was our third cruise on this ship and fourth with Cunard so we know the standards that CAN be achieved. (Most recent previous experience was in March this year - Auckland NZ to Wellington NZ via Australia - part of the world cruise. On that occasion the poor standard of food in the Britannia restaurant caused us to look seriously at abandoning the September Mediterranean cruise. But we persevered. Thankfully the quality of produce and skills of the chefs had improved considerably since last time. But we still think that on most evenings offering half of both the main courses and appetisers as "vegetarian" is far too many. Waiter service in the restaurant was first class, though the sommelier left more than a little to be desired. Drinks waiter service in the Lido (lunch) was (as before) patchy. You should not have to go looking for a waiter to order a drink. Similarly, overall service in the Golden Lion was also a bit hit and miss. The Lido pool area could do with some more shade. We recall there were umbrellas before - none now. We didn't go to any of the evening shows in the theatre - mainly because nothing appealed. However we feel the string musicians playing around the ship could do with a bit of makeover - the performances were rather hard work for us an an audience. Top marks to the young lady who was our stateroom steward. Our modest requests were never too much trouble and she did a good job keeping things today. Well done Edna! The makeover of the staterooms during the recent refit was very good, particularly the much larger TV and providing facilities for making tea or coffee. Read Less
Queen Victoria Ratings
Category Editor Member
Cabins 4.0 0.0
Dining 5.0 0.0
Entertainment 4.0 0.0
Public Rooms 5.0 0.0
Fitness Recreation 5.0 0.0
Family 3.0 0.0
Shore Excursion 4.0 0.0
Enrichment 4.0 0.0
Service 4.0 0.0
Value For Money 4.0 0.0
Rates 3.0 0.0

Find a Queen Victoria Cruise

Easily compare prices from multiple sites with one click
Compare and book excursions for your next cruise