Sail Date: July 2017
This was two ports in Scotland, three in Ireland plus Iceland and Greenland and Fareo islands. The North Atlantic was rough but we endured. We knew the smaller 55 thousand ton ship would have pluses and minuses, so our expectations were ... Read More
This was two ports in Scotland, three in Ireland plus Iceland and Greenland and Fareo islands. The North Atlantic was rough but we endured. We knew the smaller 55 thousand ton ship would have pluses and minuses, so our expectations were met. PLUSES: No crowded decks. Easy on and off. Well organized excursions. Open seating. Excellent food service. Helpful crew and staff. MINUSES: Limited entertainment. Smaller cabin. Plenty of bouncing in the seas. Do the pluses outweigh the minuses? IN general ... Yes , but then there is the value question, and Oceania is not inexpensive . I will leave it at that ... Where the cruise goes is highly important to us at this point in our experience. If this dominates then consider Oceania for sure. If other factors are more important check out alternatives. We met many who were multi repeats on Oceania. It certainly appeals to a certain crushing set ... But maybe not others. We are into retirement years and have 100 countries visited. Read Less
6 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: July 2017
Recognizing that at any given time, the Wait Staff on a cruise ship is almost always in flux, we got the feeling many of the staff had just reported in for their first contract. HMCSBN nailed it on the crush for a table and the problems in ... Read More
Recognizing that at any given time, the Wait Staff on a cruise ship is almost always in flux, we got the feeling many of the staff had just reported in for their first contract. HMCSBN nailed it on the crush for a table and the problems in the main dining room. The two specialty restaurants were outstanding with the Italian one the better of the two. The cleaning staff was impeccable, timely and and very friendly. The best we've seen in our 15 or so cruises across 5 cruise lines. It was our first Oceania cruise & if we do another with them, it'll be on one of their bigger ships. The lone launderette was adequate, but cramped & crowded. The non-staff entertainers left a bit to be desired. A comic, the mandatory violinist, a magician, all reminded us of why we'd never heard of them. If on-board shopping is your thing, or if you left your favorite deodorant at home, forget it on Nautica. There are the obligatory watches, a limited choice of logo apparel items, etc., but you quickly find out where you can find a Tesco or other retailer when you hit your next port. Excursions: In a word, expensive. Many other folks found their own whale-watching adventures, or glacier & iceberg boats, at far cheaper prices than Oceania's. Lectures: Outstanding presentations by one of the two men to ever go to Challenger Deep in the Marianas Trench, CAPT Don Walsh, USN (Retired), and ones about Broadway and West End theater productions by a Broadway producer. If we go on Oceania again, it'll be because of the port visits, not because of the Nautica experience. Read Less
Sail Date: June 2017
From Capt Max to the lowliest deckhand , the staff were friendly, obliging, and smiling throughout the entire cruise. Capt max did an amazing job, mixing with the guests and sharing his time without hesitation. The ship was spotless and ... Read More
From Capt Max to the lowliest deckhand , the staff were friendly, obliging, and smiling throughout the entire cruise. Capt max did an amazing job, mixing with the guests and sharing his time without hesitation. The ship was spotless and the attention to detail in all aspects of cruise management was exemplary. The ship was the perfect size for our first cruise , making it possible for the crew to get to know and remember everyone's names and vice versa. The onboard facilities were more than adequate for the number of passengers and provided a good blend of places to eat, drink and play for everyone. It was unfortunate that we missed our first stop because of strong currents in the Dardenelles after leaving Copenhagen but this was beyond anyone's control. We encountered a problem on trying to enter Murmansk because the Russian Navy was conducting an exercise but Capt Max , being Russian and exnavy himself was able to exert enough influence to get us a 20 min window that allowed us to enter Russia and carry out immigration formalities that we couldn't have done at any of the other stops in Russia. Read Less
3 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: June 2017
Oceania performed as expected. The food was amazing, the ports of call were wonderful and the entertainment was very good. We thought Cory "from the bridge" did a wonderful job as cruise director. Captain Max was very ... Read More
Oceania performed as expected. The food was amazing, the ports of call were wonderful and the entertainment was very good. We thought Cory "from the bridge" did a wonderful job as cruise director. Captain Max was very approachable and informative. Travel above the Arctic Circle was memorable and provided numerous photo opportunities. We were on the Concierge floor and cabin service was terrific. The ship was very smooth for us. We tried all the dining experiences and were very satisfied at each location. The entertainment staff made the competitions for Big O points fun events. I think they had fun with the passengers and made us all feel welcome. The show band was terrific and provided support to the "come aboard" entertainers. I t is hard to keep seasoned travelers entertained but Cory and the entertainment team did a terrific job. We had a wonderful time despite a poor trivia team result. Read Less
4 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: June 2017
We have cruised twice before on Oceania: once on Marina and once before on Nautica. While the itinerary was great, the food service was lacking. We enjoyed the ports of call and took a number of ship sponsored tours and found them all to ... Read More
We have cruised twice before on Oceania: once on Marina and once before on Nautica. While the itinerary was great, the food service was lacking. We enjoyed the ports of call and took a number of ship sponsored tours and found them all to be of good quality. The ship and its cabins are nice and the personnel all provided great service. But we felt that the service and quality of the dining experience was poor. To being, 1) the push for all to share tables becomes tedious: we are not at summer camp where we have to make new friends. 2) The itinerary took us to places where the outdoor temperatures were not conducive to outdoor dining, so the Terrace Cafe indoor seating was always packed. 3) The majority of times we went to the Terrace Cafe, we couldn't find a table (even if you were willing to share). When we complained, we were told they loose over a 100 seats due to the cold weather. 4) The Grand Dining room was our answer but they staffing has been greatly reduced and the service is slow and many times what you ordered wasn't what got delivered. 5) It seemed like much of the wait staff was new. All of the wait staff was very pleasant just overwhelmed. The pluses for Oceania are the free water and soft drinks and the lack of cross selling. But with the pricing difference, one needs to do more price comparisons. We are not as sold on Oceania as we had been. Also, disembarkation was rushed. We had to be out of our cabins by 8:00 am and off the ship by 9:00 am. Read Less
Sail Date: June 2017
We decided to take the trip on the Nautica vs. other cruise lines visiting Norway because it included a trip over the top of Norway into the Barents Sea and the White Sea, with port stops in Murmansk, Arkhangelsk and the Solovetsky Islands ... Read More
We decided to take the trip on the Nautica vs. other cruise lines visiting Norway because it included a trip over the top of Norway into the Barents Sea and the White Sea, with port stops in Murmansk, Arkhangelsk and the Solovetsky Islands in Russia. We stayed overnight in Copenhagen the night before embarkation. It was cool and raining the day we arrived, but bright and sunny on our departure. We stayed in the Square hotel near Tivoli Gardens. That area in Copenhagen is very touristy and expensive. The trip started with a very easy embarkation in the ship's lounge in Copenhagen, since the ship didn't dock at a cruise terminal but instead was at the Langelinie Pier. We missed our first stop in Alesund due to high winds, but made all of our other ports (Trondheim, Hammerfest, Murmansk, Solovetsky Islands, Archangel, Hannigsvag and North Cape, Kristiansand, Hellesylt and Geiranger fjord, Bergen, Amsterdam, Brugges). Hellesylt and the Geiranger fjord were striking in their native beauty, and Begen, Amsterdam and Brugges were all wonderful cities to visit. The Nautica is a small and inviting ship. The ship's ambiance is quiet elegant, with a lot of dark wood in the public areas. This was our second time on board in 7 months, and we felt like we were 'back home'. The small size of the ship and the length of the journey (20 days) makes it easy to meet fellow passengers. Dining on board generally is excellent. We found the Polo Grill inconsistent in its service and food quality - twice it was excellent, twice disappointing. In contrast, we found Toscana consistently outstanding. The service onboard is truly excellent. Because it's a small ship, there is not a lot of nightlife. The casino was small and inactive. There is only 1 production nightly at 9:30. We look forward to returning to the Nautica or one of the other Oceania ships in the future. Read Less
6 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: June 2017
The itinerary was of great interest to us and we were not disappointed. The captain had to make some last minute changes to the order of ports visited and duration of stay due to events beyond his control, his decisions were well made and ... Read More
The itinerary was of great interest to us and we were not disappointed. The captain had to make some last minute changes to the order of ports visited and duration of stay due to events beyond his control, his decisions were well made and maximized passenger experiences. Bravo! This was our first time in a stern cabin ..... great views and wonderful balcony space! Staff are exemplary! Medical staff went over and above when a medical condition arose so recovery was quick and interfered very little with our holiday. Staff in the Terrace cafe, dining room and specialty restaurants are knowledgeable and attentive. The quality of food confirmed Oceania's reputation as having "the best food at sea" ...... now to loose that excess weight ! Embarkation, disembarkation and tour departures were well managed and efficient ...... no "mob scenes" or races! The Oceania escorts on shore excursions did a great job especially "George the jeweler" who went over and above to assist a couple with some mobility issues navigate a 3 story museum tour. The only negative was one particular tour bus had VERY narrow seats set extremely close to one another leaving inadequate leg room for anyone 6 feet tall or more. Our experience on this bus was compounded by the physically disabled passenger seated in front of us reclining his seat after being asked to stop repeatedly thrusting his considerable weight against his seat back which re-injured my husbands knee and has limited his walking tolerance even now...... however, we recognize that Oceania cannot be held responsible for passenger behavior and we did see numerous incidents of passenger kindness and consideration. Read Less
5 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: June 2017
The reasons we booked this cruise was because it was Oceania, the itinerary (going above the Artic Circle), no photographers, few children and no up-selling. We have cruised with Oceania quite a few times and enjoy the size of the ships, ... Read More
The reasons we booked this cruise was because it was Oceania, the itinerary (going above the Artic Circle), no photographers, few children and no up-selling. We have cruised with Oceania quite a few times and enjoy the size of the ships, the atmosphere and the service. We did arrive in Copenhagen a day early which gave us time to help some with the jet lag and to explore the city some. We selected the airport transfer to the hotel and hotel to ship. Both of which worked well. This embarkation went quickly but with the area for the health questionnaire, before boarding the ship on the dock with limited cover and a bit of rain, wasn't a great way to start. However, as soon as we were on board the rest of the embarkation process went very smoothly. When we booked the cruise, we requested a penthouse cabin, but ended up deep on the wait list, finally made it to number three but ended up in a concierge veranda cabin. We had been in that cabin level before and understood the few limitations of the cabin, i.e. the small bathroom, etc. We were able to get in to the cabin about 20 minutes before the advertised time. Our luggage was at our cabin when we arrived. Our cabin steward came and introduced himself and asked if we needed anything and the two things we requested were taken care of quickly. We had excellent cabin service throughout the cruise. The cabin was always neat and clean but, after a few days in the cabin we did notice that the was some general wear and tear that we hadn't noticed on other Oceania ships. The service we received in all the dining venues was fantastic. It seemed more personalized than on other cruises but this might be since it was a 20 day cruise. The food was very good and comparable to all the Oceania cruises we have taken. The specialty restaurants excelled as they have in the past. The cruise did experience two problems, neither could be blamed on Oceania, the ship or the crew. One was bad weather that caused the Captain to slow the ship and as a result missed our first port. The second was that the Russian Navy held the ship out of Murmansk for about 12 hours while they conducted a 'naval exercise'. One highlight of the cruise was that Captain Maksym Melnikov was excellent. He always kept us updated of our status with the two minor problems we encountered. Additionally, on sea days with his noon time report of weather and position, he would also add a brief talk on subjects including, the ships' stabilizers, the northern lights, water purification on the ship, along with other interesting subjects. He was the most informative Captain we've had on any cruise. We do not participate in most of the entertainment in the lounge in the evening or the daytime activities throughout the ship. We spend port days on tours and in the towns/cities we are visiting and on sea days in the library or Horizon Lounge reading and relaxing. We didn't participate in any of the activities to get 'Big O' points. We thought the itinerary/port selection was very good. We were able to visit larger cities along with some very remote ports. The tours were a bit pricey, but we had selected one tour in each of the ports we visited except for Bergen. Most of the tours were very good, with a couple that were a pleasant surprise and one that was a bit disappointing. The ones that were very interesting included the tour in Murmansk that went through the first nuclear ice breaker. The ship has been restored to the level of a museum. There is still more restoration underway, but visitors get to visit all areas of the ship from the reactor to the bridge. The other tour of note was in Arkangelsk, Russia, entitled "A Tour in the Wood". Visitors are taken to an outdoor museum of an old village/town which included many buildings that visitors could enter. The village guide took us through, explaining history, life at the time and even showed and described construction of the buildings. The one disappointing tour was one that had a relatively young, inexperienced guide that I felt could have spent time on culture and history of the area. The other Excursions in Norway, Russia, The Netherlands were all very good. In Belgium we selected the 'Bruges on your own' since we have been there multiple times. To sum this cruise up we had a great time and have also booked a back to back cruise next year. Read Less
1 Helpful Vote
Sail Date: June 2017
I choose the Baltic Sea cruise on Oceania Nautica because of the itinerary and the relatively small size of the ship. We spent 3 days in London (not enough time) before boarding the ship at Southampton and 2 days in Copenhagen following ... Read More
I choose the Baltic Sea cruise on Oceania Nautica because of the itinerary and the relatively small size of the ship. We spent 3 days in London (not enough time) before boarding the ship at Southampton and 2 days in Copenhagen following the cruise. Both embarkation and disembarkation were quick and easy. Our C-1 cabin had plenty of storage for clothes and other items; in fact I was amazed that with 2 ladies travelling together we did not fill all the available space! The dining choices were good - plenty to choose from. I was disappointment that for our one reservation at Polo Grill I was served a chewy steak with little flavor and another person at my table had a poor quality steak as well. Toscano was outstanding! The Grand Dining Room had many good choices as did the buffet. I would have liked more flavor in several dishes though. The fresh berries were a real treat - the best I've ever had. Service was outstanding, our cabin steward almost looked hurt if we didn't want her to straighten up in the evening. We had room service bring breakfast several times as we had early tours and they were always prompt and with the correct order. I did go on 2 of the Oceania excursions - both were fine but had 30 - 35 people on the tour. I prefer smaller groups so we either did our own walking tour, joined a local walking tour, or joined a small group tour (less than 12 people). I thought this was a great experience and a very good itinerary, but I would probably not go on a cruise again as I felt we just didn't have enough time in port and had to stop what we were doing to get back to the ship on time. But if I did go on another cruise, I would be happy to sail on Oceania again. Read Less
3 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: June 2017
This cruise had a good itinerary and went to cities we really wanted to see. The staff were wonderful, so polite and accomodating; the meals, especially in the Grand dining room and two specialty restaurants were all delicious and ... Read More
This cruise had a good itinerary and went to cities we really wanted to see. The staff were wonderful, so polite and accomodating; the meals, especially in the Grand dining room and two specialty restaurants were all delicious and beautifully presented. We had the O life package which included free internet (slow, but it worked OK) and $600 cabin credit. The bed linen and towels were of very good quality, as were the toiletries. Complimentary bottled water was supplied each day in our room and handed out on leaving the ship for day excursions. We only took one ship sponsored excursion, from Vlissingen to Brugge, it was well organised and enjoyable. In other cities we either did our own excursion or went with a local tour company which worked out very well. We thoroughly enjoyed our time on Nautica, especially liked the afternoon high teas with the string quartet playing, we will definitely look to cruise with Oceania again. Read Less
Nautica Ratings
Category Editor Member
Cabins 4.0 4.0
Dining 5.0 4.3
Entertainment 3.0 3.2
Public Rooms 5.0 4.4
Fitness Recreation 5.0 3.8
Family 2.0 3.8
Shore Excursion 4.0 3.0
Enrichment 5.0 3.4
Service 4.0 4.5
Value For Money 5.0 3.5
Rates 5.0 3.9

Find a Nautica Cruise