3 Cruise & Maritime Voyages Marco Polo Spring Break Cruise Reviews

She is an old boat but appears to be well maintained by the crew cabins shabby but sheak house keeping,bar staff and the waiting team servicing the evening in the Waldorf restaurant top notch however the Evining meal was on most night ... Read More
She is an old boat but appears to be well maintained by the crew cabins shabby but sheak house keeping,bar staff and the waiting team servicing the evening in the Waldorf restaurant top notch however the Evining meal was on most night passibie for restraunt style food (only one tuc biscuit with Mouse portion of cheese)but the same can not be said for the breakfast or lunch menus Breakfast used cheap smoked sausage inedible greasy bacon watery beans tomatoes and very unappetising scrambled eggs cheap cardboard breakfast cereals not great however the lunch buffet in Marcos took the biscuit. salad meats of spam luncheon meats salami not a real portion of reconisibile meat chicken ham pork etc that my years of cruising could recognise if you love cream of beetroot or parsnip soup you've cracked it.all the deserts are servived in small portions with all the imitation whipped cream you can manage. There is a grill on the deck at the bistro rear most days one day it may be a sausage next day a chicken leg the next a portion of ropey salmon and finally a hamburger Afternoon tea is a little better but inedible sandwiches (old BR style curled ends) what part of salami and cream cheese is a ham&cheese sandwich. supper don't go there 0 out of 10 Greasy deep fried chicken wings of a sort. Entertainment poor shows not great young inexperienced singers very unfunny comedian.DJ was great. Bench style seating in the theatre not very comfortable as are the plastic garden style chairs on rear decks first and last time with this company it's true you get what you pay for, I will pay more in future with one of the other cruise lines no such thing as a free lunch (or cruise) Read Less
Sail Date April 2017
We chose this cruise because we liked the itinerary. Age group 60 - 90 years of age. Very elderly frail clientele - not a good combination with rough seas so we were greeted with 2 ambulances on the dockside at our first port stop. An ... Read More
We chose this cruise because we liked the itinerary. Age group 60 - 90 years of age. Very elderly frail clientele - not a good combination with rough seas so we were greeted with 2 ambulances on the dockside at our first port stop. An emergency helicopter evacuation of a patient also took place. We were worried about the full evacuation process should an emergency arise with the numbers of frail elderly and people with walking difficulties aboard. Baltic deck (rear): very noisy due to engine noise and waves crashing. Ear plugs recommended ! Food: European. Queues outside restaurants before they opened - no reason for this ! Food varied in quality. Cabin; good size, plenty of hanging space, drawers etc. No fridge or kettle however. Good bathroom size but very noisy with waves crashing against the side of the ship. Entertainment; limited and based around the older age group. Knit & natter; bean bag throwing, quiz, bingo, make a frilly scarf etc. Decks often partially closed for maintenance. We did like the photographic lectures. Gym and activities: limited activities due to entertainment crew needing space to rehearse. Uncomfortable chairs on sun decks & the theatre had padded bench style seating Embarkation: Virtually a warehouse. Very rushed scanning process at Bristol - port staff shoving things through before you could unpack. Cleanliness: Crew to be congratulated on their thoroughness. Maintenance: appeared good. We reported leaking tap & sink and these were repaired. Crew: very friendly & helpful Excursions: good but could be expensive. Many were only half a day due to the elderly clientele. We preferred to go it alone in the main ports as we wanted to utilise the whole day in port rather than be taken back to the ship at lunchtime. Read Less
Sail Date April 2017
We chose this cruise, having been on Marco Polo three times before, for the two new locations, never visited before, of Jersey and Guernsey, on the itinerary. The disappointment that we could not call at either port was considerable, all ... Read More
We chose this cruise, having been on Marco Polo three times before, for the two new locations, never visited before, of Jersey and Guernsey, on the itinerary. The disappointment that we could not call at either port was considerable, all the more as the alternative berths secured at the last minute were Cherbourg and Rouen. We visited both of these last year and were in no hurry to repeat the experience. Instead of being an interesting cruise it was 'same old same old' and we felt that we had been conned into booking a cruise which turned out to be a different, and poorer, one. Compounding this I was unhappy the weather in Amsterdam, Bruges and Cherbourg was so horrible: wet and windy. I had a bad cough from almost the beginning, which got progressively worse throughout the six dreary days at sea. Inner cabin, gets very claustrophobic but where you'd think they might upgrade regular customers, who spend a thousand quid in six days, mostly on alcohol and cigarettes, none of which I indulge in, unfortunately it's the non-spenders who get the best treatment. Having said that, the Marco Polo is a fine ship, the staff are good and the entertainment is not at all bad. Food OK on the whole but I barely ate anything, not feeling too good. We avoided the Waldorf restaurant, deciding after three earlier cruises aboard there was nothing to be gained from sitting at a table with strangers at a set time when instead we could grab a bite in Marco's bistro, at a table for two, when it suited us. Shame they only put one of the soups on available in the Waldorf, but apart from this it's pretty much the same food. Continental breakfast in bed is a nice touch, but after four days I couldn't eat any breakfast anywhere. Room service for other food is available, at a price, and this was OK when we had it before. The cabin stewards work very hard it seems to keep the cabins nice and fresh and make the beds twice a day. Not feeling well I needed to rest a lot, but found the cabin steward banging on the door for one thing or another a constant stress. You could never truly relax. The ship is full of old people, so i suppose the evening game show ('Mr and Mrs', God help us, 'Play Your Cards Right' or 'Blankety Blank') was to be expected. It is annoying how much so many of them hog the available tables, well before an appointed mealtime, usually to get the best window seats, yet so few ever seem to buy anything. It's like endless mugs of coffee and tea with these people, and a frightful scrum for the free glass of wine offered one night (I think in compensation for missing the Channel islands out altogether). Shuttle buses are good, compared to other cruise lines. P and O and Fred Olsen are a disgrace in this regard. They are also free, which must please the penny-pinching majority on this ship. Waiting to get off the ship is a nightmare, every time. Unless you have the better cabins. Fed up with waiting for our colour of luggage label to be called we decided to wing it and got off anyway. So glad to be home. But I would wholeheartedly recommend the Marco Polo. It's still one of the best small ships out there, and if you don't get ill and can keep your costs down (unlike my boozer of a partner) you are onto a winner. Read Less
Sail Date March 2015
Marco Polo Ratings
Category Editor Member
Cabins 3.0 3.7
Dining 3.0 3.5
Entertainment 3.0 3.6
Public Rooms 4.0 3.8
Fitness Recreation 3.0 3.2
Family 1.0 3.2
Shore Excursion 4.0 3.3
Enrichment 4.0 3.2
Service 4.0 3.9
Value For Money 5.0 3.6
Rates 4.0 3.6

Find a Marco Polo Cruise

Easily compare prices from multiple sites with one click