1. Home
  2. Cruise Lines
  3. Regent Seven Seas Cruises
  4. Regent Seven Seas Cruises Cruise Reviews
10 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2018
We chose this cruise because of the itinerary. We had a choice of Regent or their sister line, Oceania for the same itinerary. We decided to give Regent a try and we were very happy we did. We had sailed Oceania before and we found Regent ... Read More
We chose this cruise because of the itinerary. We had a choice of Regent or their sister line, Oceania for the same itinerary. We decided to give Regent a try and we were very happy we did. We had sailed Oceania before and we found Regent and Oceania comparable in most ways. We also found the cost to be about the same when you add the things that are included on Regent to similar things at extra cost on Oceania. We also liked that business class air was available. The things that we found better on Regent than Oceania: Embarkation was smooth and simple. We disembarked independently and that went smoothly as well. Our Category G cabin was larger and the bathroom much nicer than the similar category on Oceania's small ships. The included excursions were not nearly as crowded as similar excursion either included or at cost on Oceania. Fewer people made for a more intimate and comfortable excursion experience. Also, the excursions seemed to be paced better for the audience. Food is comparable on both lines. Launderettes are free and busy but we never had a serious problem using them when they were open. The shore excursion organization on the Regent Mariner was much better organized and operated more smoothly than our last cruise on the Oceania Insignia last April/May. The one complaint many people had came during the time the ship was dealing with a gastroenteritis outbreak. The quarantine process was well run and the staff worked hard and contained the outbreak but the outbreak required the closing of the free launderettes for over a week. That made it difficult for those onboard that needed to wash clothes. A larger group of the passengers felt like the ship should have offered free laundry during that period of time. All in all, we really enjoyed the experience enough to book another cruise on Regent. Read Less
5 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2018
This was our fourth cruise with RSS but our first on Mariner. We got a chance to explore Lima before we embarked, which went very smoothly, once we had lobbied the local DMC company to stick to the stated embarkation times guaranteed by ... Read More
This was our fourth cruise with RSS but our first on Mariner. We got a chance to explore Lima before we embarked, which went very smoothly, once we had lobbied the local DMC company to stick to the stated embarkation times guaranteed by RSS, according to suite status! Disembarking in Buenos Aires was less smooth as a shuttle bus had to be used to transport guests to the terminal from the ship. This city needs a dedicated cruise terminal badly, given the number of ships coming here. Mariner's refit has been put back from early 2017, and it showed. Things generally look tired, carpets, curtains, public areas etc. Dining is something championed by RSS but the menus remain the same in Prime 7, year on year. Signatures only had four main courses, which is a bit limiting over a longer cruise. Guests can dine in both restaurants a limited number of times, according to suite status, but even so, if fortunate to have more opportunities, selection of dishes is poor. Compass Rose is a star performer, lots of choice, very good quality and excellent service. Good atmosphere. Settle Mare also suffers from a 'samey' menu. Starter buffet much the same every night we went there. Main courses don't automatically come with vegetables, so ask! Wines very good. We don't use the entertainment offers but friends spoke highly of it. The Star Duo in the Horizon Lounge were our favourites! Very talented indeed. Lectures by Terry Breen were much appreciated. Lounges and bars cater very well for guests with great staff who remember your cocktail favourites! Excursions were diverse and informative. Local guides and drivers, without exception, were first class. A longer journey to an activity soon passed in professional hands. Very well chosen and executed excursions. Some of the ports were more interesting than others but the sights and wildlife viewing opportunities were faultless. Our only grave disappointment being the captain's decision not to dock in the Falkland Islands due to inclement weather. Whilst this decision was respected, and alternative port and excursions efficiently organised, we feel that RSS should state very clearly indeed in their given itinerary that the chances of visiting this port are far less than 50%. This destination was the sole reason we chose this cruise. So for this reason alone would not repeat cruise, especially at six star prices! Read Less
38 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2018
We chose this cruise for two reasons. One- the itinerary, we always wanted to cruise the Chilean fiords and Cape Horn, and two we were willing to pay the premium for Business Class air and fee free excursions and amenities etc. We expected ... Read More
We chose this cruise for two reasons. One- the itinerary, we always wanted to cruise the Chilean fiords and Cape Horn, and two we were willing to pay the premium for Business Class air and fee free excursions and amenities etc. We expected exceptional service and support. The service by staff was very good and many of the excursions were outstanding. But the ship was tired. We had elevator breakdowns for extented periods, laundry was shut down for hygiene problems, our tender lacked maintenance (forward hatch malfunctioned and drenched some passengers in a rough sea while returning to the ship). The baggage management from airport to the ship was a mess. Our return trip was exhausting. We had to vacate our suite at 8am, muster for a bus trip to a hotel where we sat around for 6 hours in an area with nothing to do but visit a shopping mall. We were routed from Buenas Aires to Lima and then to Miami on Latam Airlines. The second leg left after midnight local time. Although we thought we were staying on the same plane such was not the case. We had to go through security again and rush to another gate....It appeared to us that since a large percentage of their passengers are repeat clients, that Regent treated new clients significantly differently. We know some travelers had direct flights to Miami. We doubt we will choose Regrnt for any future cruising plans. Read Less
38 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: February 2017
I choose this ' Last on the Bucket List ' cruise partly to visit the Chilean Fiords, The Falkland Islands (to show the wife where I was in 1982), and also Macchu Picchu a pre cruise option. Due to the weather, we did not see ... Read More
I choose this ' Last on the Bucket List ' cruise partly to visit the Chilean Fiords, The Falkland Islands (to show the wife where I was in 1982), and also Macchu Picchu a pre cruise option. Due to the weather, we did not see much of the Fiords or visit The Falklands. To be honest we would not have taken this cruise after our 1st experienced of Regent on the South African cruise in November 2016 but rather than lose the 20% deposit and also we could not find another suitable we decided to give them another chance. This time service was better, bar one waiter in the Compass Rose restaurant. Our cabin was well maintained but needed new balcony furniture. This time the shore excursions were reasonable. However, the one to Santiago and the one in Buenos Aires, too long was spent on the coach. We like german sweet wines and were surprised a Spatlese (sorry no umlaut over the 'a') had been replaced with a kabinet for the same price $60. The cruise was slightly affected by a gastro enteritis bug on the ship but the crew prevented it spreading by ensuring guests sanitized hands regularly and those affected were confined to their cabins. The one main gripe about this cruise was the Matarani port of call, for excursion around Arequipa, was cancelled due to 'infrastructure' problems. The ship would have been at anchor here so I was surprised and did some research and discovered Phoenix Reisen, Silverseas and Hapag Lloyd would visiting later. However, I was unable to find out what the problems were from Guest Relations. No other port of call was included to replace this one and no reimbursement given, so anchorage fees, the 'free' shore excursions and less fuel used obviously contributed to the cruise profits. Also a couple of days prior to our call at Punta Arenas they changed from docking to at anchor, no reason given for this. Docking/at anchor is arranged well in advanced for ships! A Crystal ship was docked when we arrived. We were still a little disappointed with the overall standard of the cruise and on speaking to several repeat Regent customers they informed us standards had deteriorated over the last year or so. Read Less
44 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: February 2017
The itinerary was boring. There was one lecturer;she was excellent, but she was solo. he food was ok,butt the big problem was that many passengers became ill, including my husband, who happens to be a physician. A trip to the ship's ... Read More
The itinerary was boring. There was one lecturer;she was excellent, but she was solo. he food was ok,butt the big problem was that many passengers became ill, including my husband, who happens to be a physician. A trip to the ship's doctor cost $750 for the doctor's services and another $700 for medication which cost 3 times less in the states. My husband contracted the flu although both of us were vaccinated prior to boarding. The doctor prescribed Tamaflu for each of us; preventively for me and as a treatment for my husband. At $300 per packet, it was almost 3 times the cost in the U.S. as a local pharmacy. I can't imagine a fine cruise line which charges for an upscale experience needing to overcharge their passengers who have no choice but to use their service. Be sure to take every conceivable medication with you on your next cruise...you may need it!!! Read Less
74 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2016
described as ultra luxury ? nothing of the sort and certainly much of the advertising for this cruise found misleading and thus apparently in violation of ABTA Code of Conduct Rule l. Ship in some respects appeared desperately in need of ... Read More
described as ultra luxury ? nothing of the sort and certainly much of the advertising for this cruise found misleading and thus apparently in violation of ABTA Code of Conduct Rule l. Ship in some respects appeared desperately in need of refurbishment now rather than in a year's time - seeming deficiencies in directions and control for life boat drill - bathrooms with black mould that came off in black streaks - ice machines with black mould report in CDC Sanitation Report 13th 2016 - poor hygiene in restaurants as also referred to in CDC report - language difficulties with junior staff and hence restaurant service slow even though ship not fully booked - tired table clothes, napkins badly ironed and hardly any flowers - restaurant food below standard with meat on occasion either cold, raw or well over-cooked - themed restaurants fully booked or available only by queuing before opening time - mismatch between restaurant opening times and tour times - staff evidently on fixed hours and clearing away well before closing times - some gym equipment not working - virus requiring Code Red declaration probably already on board when cruise started but no notification as highlighted in CDC report - Cod Red procedure was badly managed with poor communication between senior staff and both passengers and junior staff - no clear policy on laundry closing - length of time Code Red in force excessive, suggesting cleaning procedures ineffecive and there being an unknown underlying cause - tendering difficulties which would appear to be a regular problem possibly due to poor condition or out dated design of the tendering platforms and the Mariner having a tendency to roll even in calm waters - cancelled visit to Falklands (an anticipated cruise highlight) without any satisfactory explanation with that visit having apparently also been cancelled on two or the previous three relevant occasions - interestingly the Captain was heard to remark in effect "I am dammed if I go and dammed if I don't - many tours disappointing with long periods on buses trying to find something to look at - shuttle-bus transfers limited and in Matarani downright dangerous with people standing or sitting on the floor being driven fast round precarious hairpin bends - complaints to Destinations staff not responded to - in addition to the Falklands two other ports missed with Regent thereby saving significant amounts in port fees and tours which passengers had paid for up front and - then negative responses to requests for additional free Wifi in respect of the resulting unplanned extra sea days - mid cruise feed-back forms mostly ignored - end-of-cruise feed back forms sent out too late to be completed on board - letter of complaint taking 42 days for Regent to reply (thus breaking ABTA Rule 5) and even then with little attempt to address specific complaints and even less to address a follow up for the many things promised in brochures but not provided or fulfilled no compensation of any sort merely a miserly and time limited £720.00 gesture of good will as a discount off a future cruise booking You can keep Regent's expensive so called ultra luxury - there is lots better at a lower price elsewhere. Read Less
118 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2016
Looking forward to our trip of a lifetime turned into the trip from H___. After 3 days at sea, we got shut down by a stomach/diarrhea virus for the whole trip. Once we could not serve ourselves due to Code Red, there were not enough ... Read More
Looking forward to our trip of a lifetime turned into the trip from H___. After 3 days at sea, we got shut down by a stomach/diarrhea virus for the whole trip. Once we could not serve ourselves due to Code Red, there were not enough people to serve the passengers. Instead of putting individual salt and pepper packages out at a table, we had to sit and wait for servers to salt and pepper our food while our food got cold. The main breakfast/lunch restaurant food was basically the same everyday. Just average. The Compass Rose restaurant, food was just average. Beef was tough and chewy everywhere on the ship. In Prime 7 it was not “prime” beef. The specialty restaurants were better than the other restaurants. All restaurants had a problem with the food not coming out hot. Other cruise ships offer a casual dining area throughout the afternoon into the evening where you can obtain a sandwich for a quick dinner after you have been touring all day. You had this capability at the pool restaurant but it is closed after 4 pm and are forced to go to the main dining rooms for a long drawn out meal or sit in your room with marginal room service. In regards to our ports, some we wondered why we stopped there as there was nothing to see. The tours were marginal to say the least, the poorest tours we have been on while cruising. Towards the end of our trip we quit going on the tours we booked because of so many poor experiences. Iquique and Coquimbo were missed due to tender issues. This saved Regent money but cost us our experience which we have paid for. In Ushuia we were told we had nets in the engine, our next stop was the Falkland Islands, the highlight of the trip. Instead of fixing it there, we were told we had to miss two more ports, (a total of 4 now) and spend 4 days at sea. We wondered why Regent’s corporate office didn't arrange to fly some divers in to investigate the problem before we got to Ushuaia. It was determined at that time we were ok to run at a normal speed, yet we couldn’t we get to another port early, instead they drug out 4 days at sea. We were all seasoned travelers and understand the problems that can arise with travel. The problem is with how Regent handled the problems. Regent missed ports but no attempt was made to obtain additional ports of call or to procure an earlier arrival at the next port to get us off the ship. No attempt was made to provide any additional activities or entertainment by the cruise director to make our days more palatable at sea, now of which there were 10. We were on a constant code red due to intestinal illnesses. No attempt was made to make our life better such as no laundry charges (they shut the self serve laundry down), many of us packed less relying on the laundromat. This is an added cost to us. Our level of service was greatly diminished due to the extra disinfecting and lack of staff. The crew was inattentive to passengers, why try since we were all so unhappy? Missing ports saved fuel, docking expenses and tour expenses. At no time was there an attempt made to get us to the next port earlier even when it was a tender port, instead the captain slowed the ship down to 13 knots to poke along to our next destination. We have been on Tauck where a similar thing happened in Europe and they changed buses, dockage etc. to accommodate the guests and made the negative a positive. (By the way Tauck tours are awesome) We sent a letter to Regent and were offered $1000.00 on our next cruise. This is less than what was being offered on board if we booked another cruise. Our travel agent has quit referring customers to Regent after our experiences and treatment. Regent has been taken over by Norwegian Cruise lines and apparently has lost their ability to provide the quality and customer service they were known for. Read Less
7 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2016
I had wanted to try one of the luxury cruise lines, after having sailed multiple time with Princess, Celebrity, RCCL, NCL, and others. This was our first try with Regent, and it was mixed. First, the good. Our stateroom was ... Read More
I had wanted to try one of the luxury cruise lines, after having sailed multiple time with Princess, Celebrity, RCCL, NCL, and others. This was our first try with Regent, and it was mixed. First, the good. Our stateroom was incredible. Even though it was a lower level veranda suite (#899) and at the very end of the hallway, it was huge, with a walk-in closet, bathroom with tub and shower, and plenty of room to lounge about. The bed was comfortable, although we did have to ask for better pillows. L'Occitane toiletries were wonderful. The refrigerator in the room was fully stocked when we boarded, but with selections we did not care for. But not to worry - our room steward, Jonell, was on top of everything, and had fulfilled our beverage requests within less than a day. He even managed to acquire a case of diet root beer (which is never available on ANY cruise ship!). In addition, there was a chilled bottle of champagne waiting, and bottles of both Baileys and a port wine were brought along with our other requests. Service on the ship was flawless. I think the word "no" must be banned from their vocabularies, as we were only told "no" a couple of times, and that was from the passenger services desk (asking for binoculars and for refunds for missed ports). All waiters were accommodating, even getting wines from other restaurants on request. As I said before, our room steward and his assistant were fabulous, and were able to find things the desk said were unavailable. The entertainers were even accommodating. We enjoyed dancing before dinner, and the band made the effort to learn the songs we'd requested. Ship personnel are encouraged to mix and mingle with passengers, so one gets to know both the other passengers and the staff, as much as you desire. No one was intrusive, but they were all friendly and available. The food was good quality, but did not vary much. Main courses changed daily, and rotated on a weekly schedule, but the supplementary courses did not change at all. There is no buffet at night, so the restaurants or room service are the only choices. One nice thing was that the menus for all restaurants are on the in-room TV all day, so you can at least see what's being offered. We had reserved the special dining venues (1 night at each) prior to boarding, but did not have much trouble adding nights as needed. The steaks were the best I have ever eaten anywhere. The wines were equally good, and included (which was dangerous for my diet). Included shore excursions were generally uninspired. Several were large bus tours, which were difficult to hear and see from. The smaller tours were better, generally, but the Tango Show in Buenos Aires was the absolute highlight, and was an included tour. Tours to lagoons to see wildlife would have been much better had I thought to bring binoculars. I generally book our excursions through non-ship sites, and found Regent's to be lacking overall. The entertainment on board was generally very good, and many were excellent. The lectures were variable, but we did thoroughly enjoy Terry Breen, who has quite a following on Regent ships. Production numbers were amazing, and the occasional comedian, musician, etc. were quite good. Now the disappointments - we had 4 tender ports, and missed 3 of them due to rough seas (2 ports) and a fishing net getting caught in our propeller (Falklands). The only tender port we actually made was in a protected cove so the seas did not affect it. The fishing net slowed us down so that we did not have time to get to the Falklands, and apparently there are no certified divers in the southern part of So. America. That was hugely disappointing. Sea days on Regent Mariner were boring. We had been accustomed to having so many options, it was difficult to fit them all in. The smaller Mariner offered primarily games (bridge, canasta, trivia) and a couple of lectures. A GI bug invaded the ship during our first week, and was quite persistent. Although I understand the need to follow CDC guidelines in order to wipe that bug out, the ship cancelled several things which did not make sense to us, and were never explained. For example, a wine tasting event was cancelled despite the fact that each participant had his/her own glassware and wines were poured by staff. The appetizers, which had been passed by waiters during the pre-dinner hour, were stopped altogether. The free laundromat for passengers was also shut and locked due to the illness. There may be an explanation for why this was necessary, but I never heard it. The poor quality shore excursions were the only other disappointment on our trip. Despite these negatives, we will give Regent 1 more try and see how they do next time. Read Less
121 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2016
My husband and I joined the Regent Seven Seas Mariner in Lima on 31st January 2016 – a 53 night cruise bound for Miami via Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro. Although we had booked a Concierge D level room this was a disappointment and ... Read More
My husband and I joined the Regent Seven Seas Mariner in Lima on 31st January 2016 – a 53 night cruise bound for Miami via Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro. Although we had booked a Concierge D level room this was a disappointment and noticeably smaller than the suites on the Voyager. Even the bathroom was much smaller. The ship is tired and in need of refurbishment which is scheduled for late 2017. We were bitterly disappointed in the first two legs of our cruise from Lima to Buenos Aires and Buenos Aires to Rio de Janeiro. Problems started soon after departing Lima when on-board gastroenteritis reached reportable levels and Code Red restrictions were enforced. This meant the public laundries were closed, there was no salt or pepper or other condiments left on the dining tables, you had to wait for an attendant to bring them by which time the food was cold, there were no nibbles with drinks and every surface was constantly damp because of extreme disinfectant being sprayed throughout the ship. The staff tried the best they could, but even their numbers were depleted because of illness, so they were under continuous pressure. These restrictions lasted most of the cruise so passengers felt that being charged even half the normal amount to have their laundry done by the ship was less than satisfactory. I choose cruises based on their itinerary and that was the main reason for choosing Regent. The advertised destinations including the Chilean Fjords, Punta Arenas, the Beagle Channel and the Falkland Islands, as well as the opportunity to swim and snorkel at some amazing destinations further North were what attracted me. What a letdown this was. Of the 20 different advertised ports, we missed 7 mostly because of perceived difficulty in launching tenders and one due to being quarantined because of shipboard illness. We were constantly being told there was a storm cell following us, but apart from a few days of overcast weather, we encountered no severe weather, rough seas or strong winds. There was never any difficulty walking around the ship hence why we missed so many ports remains a mystery. I would question the timing of the itinerary which meant the ship arrived in some ports in the afternoon when winds (and sea swell) are usually at their highest. I would also question why a captain would choose to pass through an area such as the Beagle Channel in the dark knowing that everyone on board wanted to see the sights in this picturesque area? We missed most of the Glaciers in this area because of poor timing. The Captain decided when leaving Ushuaia, two days prior to scheduled arrival that it would be too rough to tender in the Falkland Islands, so we limped up the East Coast to Punta Del Este at a sluggish 12 knots. We had 15 sea days instead of 8 making it more like a cheap relocation cruise than the luxury all-inclusive adventure exploring interesting new locations that we had paid for. The worst time was spent in the port of Santos, the largest port in Brazil. As mentioned by others, the ship’s emergency generator failed to operate during testing, so it took 4 days to locate and install a temporary emergency generator. During the remainder of the time in Santos we were confined to the ship because the first day we did an orientation tour of the town and were repeatedly told by the local guide how dangerous the town was and that it is unwise to walk around the area. It was impossible to spend any time on the balcony because of the unbearable noise emanating from the grain silos and train line directly opposite the wharf and swimming on board was out of the question because it rained the entire time. No additional tours or entertainment (apart from screening a couple of movies everyone had already seen) was organised, so it is impossible to overstate the frustration felt by people on board. As a result we missed out on 3 ports where swimming and snorkelling were to be highlights. The company has made an offer of a small amount of discount on a future cruise, but I’m afraid I have lost faith in Regent being able to deliver their advertised itinerary. Thankfully the final leg from Rio to Miami was an improvement even though shipboard illness persisted for about a week and we missed landing on Devil’s Island, another disappointment. The food on board the Mariner is well presented and often quite enjoyable however, there is little variation in the menu which rotates every 10 days or so. Breakfast also lacks variation. The specialty restaurants were good quality and the service on board was of a high standard but disrupted because of the illness. The regular cast of entertainers were extremely competent but the same shows were repeated on each leg of the cruise, alright if you were only doing one leg. Embarking was an easy process with lots of staff around to guide you, but arriving in Miami there was a long wait to disembark because of the port authorities (a common occurrence by all accounts). Best not to book transport too close to anticipated docking time. I would advise you not to rely too heavily on destinations when booking your cruise, otherwise you will be as disappointed as I was when you miss a lot of ports. Read Less
115 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: January 2016
Lima to Buenos Aires. We were expecting a luxury all inclusive cruise, because this is what they advertise. We discovered that with this cruise line all inclusive means that you will get the worst land tours you can imagine, with broken ... Read More
Lima to Buenos Aires. We were expecting a luxury all inclusive cruise, because this is what they advertise. We discovered that with this cruise line all inclusive means that you will get the worst land tours you can imagine, with broken down transport, guides that can't speak English, so in other words on this cruise you do not get what you pay for, the company clearly believes that providing its customers with the crapiest tours is ok. It also clearly thinks it's ok to allow you onto a boat that has a GI infection, already on board, and that it is not their fault that you get sick. Whilst all the while serving Luke warm food. The services are massively reduced during a code red, they seem to think that removing coffee from your cabin will stop the infection, that closing the laundry will help. Whilst continuing to serve Luke warm food. They offered us a 50% reduction on the ships laundry, when I explained to them that I had already paid for the use of a laundry onboard and that because they had closed it, the ship would now have to do my laundry free of charge, they agreed, whilst we were getting our laundry done foc they were charging other passengers the full rate!!! We complained throughout the trip, about the standard of the tours, the missed ports, apparently they have only been to the Falkland Islands once in the last 4 years, why is it on the itinerary? They have admitted that on our cruise that although they said that the weather was bad in the Falklands, so they couldn't go it turned out that it was actually ok so we could have gone! Instead because of a 'propeller problem' we limped at half speed 1450 nautical miles, and guess what the propeller apparently magically self-healed, so we missed the Falklands for no reason at all, gosh I wonder how much it saves the company not going to the Falklands ? We were told that someone would respond to our complaints, two months later I have received a letter saying sorry for the awful cruise but all we can offer you is £720 credit towards another one, what a joke will never go on another cruise again. We need to fight these idiots and get our money back no matter their terms and conditions these do not affect our consumer rights, and they should not be allowed to continue to get away with providing such an appalling product. Read Less
86 Helpful Votes
Sail Date: March 2015
As I started packing for my next cruise I found my notes about our travel from Callao to Rio de Janeiro, thus my delay in filing this review. Overall we still enjoyed this cruise; however the first class service we experienced in the past ... Read More
As I started packing for my next cruise I found my notes about our travel from Callao to Rio de Janeiro, thus my delay in filing this review. Overall we still enjoyed this cruise; however the first class service we experienced in the past seems to have passed and the last leg from Buenos Aires to Rio was less enjoyable. Mainly due to less desirable excursions that are further degraded by incompetent but mandatory Brazilian guides. The expected luxury cruise experience was diminished by the following observations: After moving into our cabin we found a rotten orange in our fruit bowl. We called for help with the coffee maker. After 20 minutes we made another call since nobody came or called back. First morning we ordered room service for breakfast. The coffee was okay but the omelets were dry and cold, the fruit wasn’t ripe and the toast was stale. No more breakfast in the cabin! Some drawers in the credenza were faulty since some screws were missing. I reported this fact but nobody ever came to correct. The shower doors slammed forward and backward with medium swells making loud noise. Our cabin was on deck 10 and in the morning the crew was dragging chairs above us. This was a daily disturbance. The balcony door screamed in heavy wind due to vibration of the seal. Unfriendly personnel at the doctor’s office (nurse Ratched) and MD Gustavo. Read Less
Already Booked?

Get to know who you’ll be sailing with

Find a Cruise

Easily compare prices from multiple sites with one click
Compare and book excursions for your next cruise