“Costa Classica - Asia”
Cruise review of Costa Classica

dayo Costa neoClassica 4 Costa Classica - Asia
dayo
Member Since 2011
No Forum Posts
No Helpful Votes
Overall Member Rating
My wife and i read all the reviews before we left our home and we were a bit apprehensive on what to expect once we got to singapore to start our 14 day cruise. Now we have returned home and had time to reflect on our cruise i must say that on this review section we have a lot of whingers and people who expect way too much. I have been on cruises before and this one was just as good as the others. Yeh ok the drinks are a bit on the expensive side but if you buy the packages they offer it lowers the cost somewhat.

Our only concern was the cost of their so called excursions, Dont take them they are not worth it and the cost is way to much instead do it all yourself we had no problems with transportation and when we spoke to people that had taken the excursions they found it too rushed and expensive for what you get.

The ship itself is old but very clean and our cabin was also looked after by the crew very well, the air con was spot on although being assie we dont mind the heat anyway, The food was cooked to perfection and we did not feel it was bland at all. although it would had been nice to have a cup of coffee or tea after 10pm as they seem to lock everything up

The bars are open 24/7 and the shows and entertainment put on was 50/50 not our cup of tea.

would go again and yeh a good time had by all

Costa neoClassica Cruises to Asia
Overall Ratings
  • Cabin
  • Dining
  • Embarkation
  • Enrichment Activities
  • Entertainment
  • Family & Children
  • Fitness & Recreation
  • Onboard Experience
  • Public Rooms
  • Rates
  • Service
  • Shore Excursions
  • Value for Money

Cabin review: Suite with Balcony

Port and Shore Excursions

Published 06/20/11
Helpful?
Thank dayo
No Helpful Votes
Read Cruise Critic’s Costa neoClassica Review
Costa neoClassica Cruises to Asia
Share feedback
Thank you!  Cruise Critic values your feedback.
How can we improve this page?