Subscribe today
Get Cruise Critic in your inbox

Riviera Cruise Review by Dennlyn

Home > Reviews > Member Reviews > Riviera Cruise Review by Dennlyn
Riviera
Riviera
Member Name: Dennlyn
Cruise Date: June 2014
Embarkation: Barcelona
Destination: Mediterranean
Cabin Category: inside cabin
Cabin Number: 7068
Booking Method:
See More About: Riviera Cruise Reviews | Mediterranean Cruise Reviews | Oceania Cruise Deals
Member Rating   4.0 out of 5+
Dining 4.0
Public Rooms 5+
Cabins 5.0
Entertainment Not Rated
Spa & Fitness 3.0
Family & Children Not Rated
Shore Excursions 3.0
Embarkation 2.0
Service 5+
Value-for-Money 3.0
Rates Not Rated
Write a cruise review!

Show the Lowest Price
Departure Month
Please select at least one vendor.
Avoya Travel
American Discount Cruises
Onboard.com
iCruise.com
Direct Line Cruises
Expedia
LuxuryOnly.com
Cruise.com
Priceline.com
Sponsored Links:

red arrow


Ship Facts: Riviera Review (by Cruise Critic!) | Riviera Deck Plans
Needs communications improvements

The cruise was generally satisfactory. The food, with some exceptions (such as the Polo Grill steak house) was quite good. The staff throughout the ship was helpful and pleasant, and it does a good job in necessary tasks such as waiter/waitress service, housekeeping, the selection of local guides, etc. My only significant complaint, and one noted by several other passengers, is that communications are only poor to adequate, leading to passenger confusion and other problems. Here are some examples.

The Oceania information on the shore excursions frequently does not match either with other explanations or with the actual tour. For example, the program guide might state that a tour leaves at 8:30 a.m. while the ticket might state 8:45 a.m. One couple missed a tour due to the confusion on times. Nearly every tour left later than the times listed, usually by 15 to 20 minutes.

A glaring example of poor communications was on the Rome Italy day for CIV-025, Ostia Antica. The brochure description is 2 walking figures (moderate exertion on a 1 – 3 scale). The only written description is “Inside visit of the archeological area.” The tour actually involves some quite strenuous walking on very uneven paths largely unchanged in about 2,000 years, and is certainly a 3 figure effort according to nearly everyone who went.

Oceania should have provided at least one sentence explaining the tour’s requirements and suggesting that anyone with a walking difficulty may have problems on the tour. As it was, one member of our group who should have not been on the tour slipped on the stone path and could have been seriously injured. The matter was reported to the ship by the guide for possible medical attention.

Another example of poor communications was the program brochure information on the departure terminal in Barcelona, which stated that the ship was at terminal B. In fact, the ship was at terminal A, so we had to go from B to A when we arrived and discovered the error (costing an extra 6 €). An e-mail updating the actual location should have been sent.

Communications also applies to health warnings. It would be prudent to advise passengers on sun exposure and the potential for skin cancer in the 900 heat we had in Rome, Dubrovnik and Venice. It would also be useful to remind everyone to keep hydrating, particularly in that heat. Similarly, communications applies to important activities and closings in ports. As an example, several of us planned to go to the Peggy Guggenheim in Venice, but no one informed us that it is closed on Tuesdays (the port day).

The Internet service was extremely slow and unreliable. Many of us need to be in occasional communications with family and/or our office, but reliable service was only available from ports (usually at 1 € for 10 minutes, somewhat less than your charge of $1 a minute). You may want to invest in more servers since you promise Internet service.

Overall, I’d give the cruise the grade of B. The brochure price is somewhat deceptive as Oceania charges a la carte for Internet access, the excursions, alcoholic drinks, spa treatments and other amenities. The cruise was certainly better than Royal Caribbean or Cunard, but is not as well managed as Disney.


Publication Date: 06/16/14
More Riviera Cruise Reviews

Read the previous Riviera review Read the next Riviera review

Like This Review?



More Mediterranean Cruise Reviews
Cruise Critic's Riviera Review
Oceania Cruise Deals
Oceania Message Board
Write a cruise review!
About UsAdvertisingEditorial DisclaimerPress
PrivacySite MapStoreSubscribe
X

Thank You For Signing Up!

Please Note: To ensure delivery of your free e-letters, please add news@cruisecritic.com to your address book.

We're committed to protecting your privacy and will not rent or sell your e-mail address. By proceeding, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.